Hot! No Child Left Behind Act

div lang="en" dir="ltr" class="mw-content-ltr" readability="400" xml:lang="en"> No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Full concept An react in order to in close proximity that achievement gap with accountability, flexibility, and choice, to ensure not any youngster is usually left behind. Acronym NCLB Enacted from the 107th United States Congress Effective January 8, 2002 Citations 107-110 30 Stat. 750, 42 Stat. 108, twenty four Stat. 986, 52 Stat. 781, 73 Stat. 4, 88 Stat. 2213, 102 Stat. 130 and 357, 107 Stat. 1510, 108 Stat. 154 along with 223, 112 Stat. 3076, 113 Stat. 1323, 115 Stat. 1425 in order to 2094 Codification Act(s) amended Adult Education along with Family Literacy Act Age Discrimination Act with 1975 Albert Einstein Distinguished Educator Fellowship Act of 1994 Augustus F. Hawkins-Robert T. Stafford Elementary and Secondary School Improvement Amendments of 1988 Carl D. Perkins Vocational as well as Technical Education Act connected with 1998 Civil Rights Act with 1964 Communications Act associated with 1934 Community Services Block Grant Act Department involving Education Organization Act District of Columbia College Access Act involving 1999 Education Amendments connected with 1972 Education Amendments of 1978 Education Flexibility Partnership Act with 1999 Education for Economic Security Act Educational Research, Development, Dissemination, in addition to Improvement Act connected with 1994 Elementary along with Secondary Education Act of 1965 Family along with Medical Leave Act of 1993 General Education Provisions Act Goals 2000: Educate America Act Hazardous plus Solid Waste Amendments regarding 1984 Higher Education Act connected with 1965 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act James Madison Memorial Fellowship Act Internal Revenue Code involving 1986 Johnson-O'Malley Act with 1934 Legislative Branch Appropriations Act, 1997 McKinney-Vento Homeless Assistance Act of 1987 Museum as well as Library Services Act National Agricultural Research, Extension, plus Teaching Policy Act with 1977 National as well as Community Service Act regarding 1990 National Child Protection Act with 1993 National Education Statistics Act with 1994 National Environmental Education Act of 1990 Native American Languages Act Public Law 88-210 Public Law 106-400 Refugee Education Assistance Act regarding 1980

Safe Drinking Water Act School-to-Work Opportunities Act involving 1994 State Dependent Care Development Grants Act

Legislative history Major amendments Supreme Court instances None Legislative historical past Provisions in the act Effects on teachers, schools, and school districts Increased accountability School alternative Effects upon pupil examination Improved check ratings Problems using standardised assessments Intended effects on resume and requirements Improvement through community models Quality associated with training Effect on martial arts and electives Limitations upon regional command Effects about gifted, talented, as well as high-performing students Effects with low-performing individuals as well as learners with afflictions Incentives next to low-performing college students Unrealistic objectives "Gaming" the method Variability in student possible in addition to 100% complying Children using disabilities inside No Child Left Behind Aligning this Individuals along with Disabilities Education Act using NCLB Positive effects connected with NCLB intended for college students along with afflictions Negative outcomes of NCLB pertaining to students together with afflictions Effects on racial plus ethnic minority students Attention in order to minority populations State refusal to form non-English assessments Increases segregation around open educational institutions Funding State schooling budgets Proposals intended for reform See also References

, 115 1425, introduced January 8, 2002.

. Library connected with Congress . Retrieved 2008-09-16.

U.S. Department involving Education. , 2006-02-06. Retrieved on 2008-06-05.

. clerk.house.gov. May 23, 2001. Retrieved 2008-04-28

Senate roll name vote

Dillon, Erin & Rotherham, Andy. . Retrieved August 19, 2009.

^ Scientifically Based Research. ERIC Clearinghouse about Educational Management. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 24,no.4 (Winter 2002):305 331, along with Eric A. Hanushek and Margaret E. Raymond, "Does classes responsibility lead to enhanced student performance?" Journal involving Policy Analysis along with Management 24,no.2 (Spring 2005):297-327.

Center on Education Policy, Answering this Question That Matters Most: Has Student Achievement Increased Since No Child Left Behind ? Washington: Center on Education Policy, June 2007).

List involving content articles regarding NCLB debate

No Child Left Behind Act Is Working Department with Education. Retrieved 6/7/07.

Linda Perlstein, Tested

High-Stakes Assessments inside Reading . International Reading Association. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Learning in relation to Teaching: Initial Findings from this Measuring Effective Teaching Program . Bill in addition to Melinda Gates Foundation. December 2010

ISBN 978-1-4166-0035-0 . p. 42 43

Cohen, L. G. & Spenciner, L. J. (2007). Assessment of young children & youth with exclusive needs. (3rd edition). Boston, MA: Pearson.

. National Education Association. August 2, 2006. Retrieved 2008-04-28

(nd) FairTest.org. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Carey, Kevin (24 May 2011). "Growth Models and also Accountability: A Recipe for Remaking ESEA". Education Sector.

New analyze confirms substantial disparities in assert goals for academic skill beneath NCLB . South Carolina Department of Education. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Congress To Weigh 'No Child Left Behind' . Washington Post. Retrieved November 13, 2011.

Mapping 2005 condition proficiency models upon the NAEP weighing machines . NCES 2007-482. National Center for Education Statistics. June 2007. Retrieved 2007-06-08.

Mizell, H (2003). .

. New York State Education Agency. 2005. Retrieved 2007-06-07.

.

, more text.

Beveridge, T. (2010). No Child Left Behind in addition to Fine Arts Classes. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(1), 4 7. doi:10.1080/10632910903228090.

Grey, A. (2010). No Child Left Behind around Art Education Policy: A Review regarding Key Recommendations intended for Arts Language Revisions. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(1), seven 15. doi:10.1080/10632910903228132.

Pederson, P. (2007). What Is Measured Is Treasured: The Impact associated with the No Child Left Behind Act upon Nonassessed Subjects. Clearing House, 80(6), 287 291. Retrieved from Education Research Complete database

Reville, Paul (October 2007). "Stop the Narrowing from the Curriculum By Right-Sizing School Time". Education Week 24 (Academic Search Premier. EBSCO.Web).

Jack Jennings and also Diane Stark Rentner, Ten Big Effects with the No Child Left Behind Act on Public Schools, Phi Delta Kappan, Vol. 88, No. 02,October 2006, pp. 110-113

Kathy Speregen, "Physical Education inside America's Public Schools" UMich.edu

David R. Williams1, Mark B. McClellan in addition to Alice M. Rivlin, "Beyond The Affordable Care Act: Achieving Real Improvements In Americans Health" Health Affairs August this year 29:81481-1488

Hillman et al. 2005; CDE, 2001

Holland, R. (2004) . School Reform News. March 1, 2004. The Heartland Institute. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

^ Cloud, John. from Time, July 27, 2007, pp 40 46. Retrieved April 6, 2009.

(nd) . SusanOhanian.org. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Reddell, S (2010). "High Stakes Testing: Our Children at Risk". Online Submission.

.Retrieved August 12, 2010.

Marler, David (2011). St. Louis Public Schools.

(2004) . FactCheck.org. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Haney, W. (nd) . Center with regard to the actual Study regarding Testing, Evaluation in addition to Education Policy. Lynch School connected with Education. Boston College. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

EdAccountability.org website.

. Retrieved 2008-03-06.

. Archived from with 2008-02-11. Retrieved 2008-03-06.

Harper, Liz. No Child Left Behind azines Impact on Specialized Education . Online NewsHour. August 21, 2005. pbs.org/newshour. 20 February 2009.

No Child Left Behind Act#Provisions of the act

Individuals together with Disabilities Education Act

Pages 7-8, "No Child Left Behind:Improving Educational Outcomes with regard to Students with Disabilities"

Page 10-12, , "NCLB in addition to IDEA: What parents have to know and also do"

Page 20, , "NCLB in addition to IDEA: What mother and father have to know and do"

Page 480-481, "Policies for Students Who Are Deaf as well as Hard connected with Hearing Hidden Benefits plus Unintended Consequences of No Child Left Behind,"

Page 5, "No Child Left Behind:Improving Educational Outcomes intended for Students with Disabilities"

Page 23, "No Child Left Behind:Improving Educational Outcomes regarding Students with Disabilities"

Education Policy Brief, Closing the Achievement Gap Series: Part I, "What is the Impact of NCLB on the actual Inclusion with Students with Disabilities?" Cassandra Cole,

Cassandro Cole, Interview w/ Newsroom Indiana University,

The Impact with No Child Left Behind on IDEA verts Guarantee involving Free, Appropriate Public Education with regard to Students with Disabilities: A Critical Review of Recent Case Law,

Page 5, The Impact with No Child Left Behind on IDEA s Guarantee of Free, Appropriate Public Education regarding Students with Disabilities: A Critical Review of Recent Case Law,

^ . U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved 2008-04-09.

No Child Left Behind: Misguided Approach to be able to School Accountability with regard to English Language Learners . National Association for Bilingual Education. Retrieved June 7, 2007.

Children ersus Defense Fund (2005). State associated with America s Children, 2005. Children vertisements Defense Fund.

^ Knaus, Christopher. (2007). Still Segregated Still Unequal: Analyzing the Impact of No Child Left Behind about African American Students. University regarding California, Berkley: National Urban League.

U.S. Department with Education: The Condition with Education 2006.

Owens, A., & Sunderman, G. L. (2006). School Accountability under NCLB: Aid or Obstacle regarding Measuring Racial Equity? Cambridge, MA: Civil Rights Project at Harvard University.

^ U.S. Department involving Education, Elementary as well as Secondary Education Act Budget Table. 2006. 7 April 2009.

.

Leaving No Child Left Behind: States recharged together with putting into action s nationwide education program balk at the price of compliance. The American Conservative. Retrieved 6/7/07.

FactCheck . 2004. Retrieved 2007-12-29.

(nd) . American Federation with Teachers. Retrieved 6/7/07.

Center pertaining to American Progress .

^ U.S. Department connected with Education, Fiscal Year 2009 Budget Proposal .

National Center regarding Education Statistics, Digest associated with Education Statistics 2007.

Monitor Overview

dead connection ]

. Software & Information Industry Association (SIIA). Retrieved 2008-07-06

. US Department associated with Education. Retrieved 2009-02-23

NCLB complies with university realities: classes through the discipline . Corwin Press. p. 10. ISBN 1412915554 .

. 2004-10-21. Retrieved 2008-01-03.

NCLB: 'Too Destructive for you to Salvage' , USA Today, May 31, 2007. Retrieved 6/7/07.

Beyond NCLB: Fulfilling that Promise that will Our Nation's Children , February, 2007. Retrieved 6/8/07.

. Retrieved 2008-01-03.

Weinstein, A. , Education.com, Inc. (2006).

Dillon, Sam. The New York Times. http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/n/no_child_left_behind_act/index.html?scp=1&sq=NCLB&st=cse .

Lowe, R. along with Kantor, H. (2006). From New Deal for you to No Deal: No Child Left Behind Act as well as Devolution involving Responsibility for Equal Opportunity. 76:4. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard Educational Review.

Lohman, J. , OLR Research Report (4 June 2010).

Russell Chaddock, G. , The Christian Science Monitor . (2010).

Ravitch, D. , Virginia Journal associated with Education . (November 2010).

Government Interest communities